tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414432572587218573.post3528586239549119744..comments2023-05-06T15:20:16.638+02:00Comments on Thoughts on Azure, OMS & SCOM: Migrating from SCOM R2 CU#5 to OM12. Part II: Prepare yourself…Marnix Wolfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09487479325587450184noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414432572587218573.post-72657062381242176142012-04-25T10:58:15.266+02:002012-04-25T10:58:15.266+02:00Hi Mario.
Thanks for your kind words. At the mome...Hi Mario.<br /><br />Thanks for your kind words. At the moment OM12 doesn't officially support SQL 2012. However, when SP1 comes out this might change. Perhaps we'll know more by then about being compatible with the Always On feature as well.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />MarnixMarnix Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09487479325587450184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414432572587218573.post-19168438679009273742012-04-24T21:13:46.096+02:002012-04-24T21:13:46.096+02:00Hi Marnix,
thanks for this blog, it's always ...Hi Marnix, <br />thanks for this blog, it's always helpful.<br /><br />Since you are writing SQL server version required for SCOM 2012 is SQL Server 2008 SP1, R2, or R2 SP1 i wonder...did you happen to stumble upon any information about support for SQL 2012? <br /><br />Is SCOM 2012 compatible with the AlwaysOn feature? Is it supported to run on 2012 at all, maybe with compatibility level for 2008?<br />Any hints appreciated.<br /><br />Thanks,<br />MarioMariohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00686957925958013811noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414432572587218573.post-36628109585451812442012-04-11T14:01:31.786+02:002012-04-11T14:01:31.786+02:00Hi Alex.
Thanks for the comment. My mistake, I mi...Hi Alex.<br /><br />Thanks for the comment. My mistake, I misunderstood the documentation.<br /><br />Somehow it's confusing, the way you explain it makes sense. Will adjust my blog accordingly.<br /><br />Cheers,<br />MarnixMarnix Wolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09487479325587450184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4414432572587218573.post-48980360963451876032012-04-11T09:37:15.382+02:002012-04-11T09:37:15.382+02:00Marnix thanks for these series of articles
As for ...Marnix thanks for these series of articles<br />As for collation, ms documentation says that upgrade is possible from some sql instance collations different from SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS which could be initially selected by mistake, and sql instance collation must be checked before to understand if upgrade is possible at all. And of course, agree with you, one really supported sql instance collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS for the time being.alexhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09123801536402099955noreply@blogger.com